A Miami-Dade county court has rejected a claim that an anti-ballot brokering ordinance is unconstitutional. In State v. Robaina, the defendant was charged with having more than two completed absentee ballots in his possession. The defendant moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that the ordinance violated the equal protection and freedom of speech clauses of the constitution. The County Court analyzed and rejected these arguments its order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
-
Recent Posts
- Do Mail-In Ballots Invite Election Fraud?
- U.S. Senate Will Be Final Judge in Scott v. Nelson Contest
- How Florida Recounts Work
- The History of Voting in America
- Federal Court: Florida Election Statute “Illogical, Irrational and Patently Bizarre” Orders State to Allow Correction of Mismatched Signature Ballots
- Court Finds Florida’s “Statutory Framework” Unconstitutional-Extends Voter Registration Deadline
Archives
- July 2020 (1)
- November 2018 (3)
- October 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- December 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (5)
- August 2012 (13)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (7)
- May 2012 (13)
- April 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (6)
Categories
- Absentee Ballot
- Ballot Audits
- Ballot inspection
- Ballot recounts
- Campaign Finance
- Candidate qualifications
- Early Voting
- Election contests
- Election recounts
- Florida Voting Issues
- Help America Vote Act (HAVA)
- History
- Litigation Updates
- News
- Redistricting
- Timely Issues Series
- Uncategorized
- Voter challanges
- Voter fraud
- Voter registration
- Voting machines
- Voting Rights Act
- Voting System Audits
Helpful Election Links
-
Map